4.7 Review

Proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of multiple myeloma

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 1964-1979

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.173

关键词

bortezomib; carfilzomib; immunoproteasome; NF-kappa B; proteasome; NPI-0052

资金

  1. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Foundation Scholar in Clinical Research
  2. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [6096-07]
  3. National Cancer Institute [RO1 CA102278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeting intracellular protein turnover by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as a strategy for cancer therapy is a new addition to our chemotherapeutic armamentarium, and has seen its greatest successes against multiple myeloma. The first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, was initially approved for treatment of patients in the relapsed/refractory setting as a single agent, and was recently shown to induce even greater benefits as part of rationally designed combinations that overcome chemoresistance. Modulation of proteasome function is also a rational approach to achieve chemosensitization to other antimyeloma agents, and bortezomib has now been incorporated into the front-line setting. Bortezomib-based induction regimens are able to achieve higher overall response rates and response qualities than was the case with prior standards of care, and unlike these older approaches, maintain efficacy in patients with clinically and molecularly defined high-risk disease. Second-generation proteasome inhibitors with novel properties, such as NPI-0052 and carfilzomib, are entering the clinical arena, and showing evidence of antimyeloma activity. In this spotlight review, we provide an overview of the current state of the art use of bortezomib and other proteasome inhibitors against multiple myeloma, and highlight areas for future study that will further optimize our ability to benefit patients with this disease. Leukemia (2009) 23, 1964-1979; doi: 10.1038/leu. 2009.173; published online 10 September 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据