4.7 Article

The BH3 mimetic compound, ABT-737, synergizes with a range of cytotoxic chemotherapy agents in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 2034-2041

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.151

关键词

chronic lymphocytic leukemia; BCL2; BH3; ABT-737; synergy

资金

  1. Australian NHMRC [461221, 461219]
  2. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society [7015-02]
  3. Australian Cancer Research Foundation
  4. Cancer Council of Victoria [461239]
  5. Victorian Cancer Agency
  6. HOTT Fellowship
  7. Royal Melbourne Hospital Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by overexpression of pro-survival BCL2, compounds that mimic its physiological antagonists, the BH3-only proteins, may have a role in treatment of this disease. ABT-737 is a BH3 mimetic compound that selectively targets BCL2 and BCLXL. In the present work, we report that ABT-737 is highly effective (LC50 < 50 nM) as a single agent against most (21/30) primary CLL samples, but that a sizable minority is relatively insensitive. In vitro sensitivity to ABT-737 could not be simply predicted by the patients' clinical features, including response to prior therapy or known prognostic markers (CD38 expression, 17p deletion), or the relative expression of BCL2 family proteins (BCL2, MCL1, BAX, BIM). Strikingly, co-incubation with cytotoxic agents (dexamethasone, etoposide, fludarabine, doxorubicin) sensitized most CLL samples to ABT-737, but this could not be predicted by responses to either ABT-737 or the cytotoxic agent alone. Of 17 samples least sensitive to ABT-737, 13 were sensitized by co-treatment with at least one cytotoxic agent. These data indicate that combination of ABT-737 with a second anti-leukemic agent would improve response rates and suggest a potential role for combination therapies that include BH3 mimetics for the treatment of this disease. Leukemia (2009) 23, 2034-2041; doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.151; published online 30 July 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据