4.7 Article

Reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a potential therapeutic approach for adults with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: results of a prospective phase 2 study

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1763-1770

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.102

关键词

reduced-intensity conditioning; allogeneic stem cell transplantation; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; high risk; complete remission

资金

  1. Catholic Medical Center Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 37 adults with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first (n = 30) or second (n = 7) complete remission (CR). All patients were treated with fludarabine (150 mg/m(2)) and melphalan (140 mg/m(2)) followed by transplantation from matched sibling (n = 27) or unrelated (n = 10) donors. The indications for reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic SCT (RIC-SCT) were as follows: (1) >= 50 years, 16 (43.2%) and (2) decreased organ function or active infections, 21 (56.8%). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine for sibling and tacrolimus for unrelated transplants) and methotrexate. The cumulative incidence of acute (grades II-IV) and chronic GVHD was 43.2 and 65.6%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months for surviving transplants, the 3-year relapse, non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 19.7, 17.7, 62.6 and 64.1%, respectively. Transplants in first CR showed better transplantation outcomes than those in second CR. The potential of antileukemic activity of chronic GVHD was also found. This study suggests that RIC-SCT is a potential therapeutic approach for adults with high-risk ALL in remission who are ineligible for myeloablative transplantation. Leukemia (2009) 23, 1763-1770; doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.102; published online 14 May 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据