4.7 Review

The molecular characterization and clinical management of multiple myeloma in the post-genome era

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 1941-1956

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.160

关键词

gene-expression profiling; array comparative hybridization; multiple myeloma; classification; prognosis

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA55819-09, CA97513-01]
  2. Lebow Fund to Cure Myeloma
  3. Nancy and Stephen Grand Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer-causing mutations disrupt coordinated, precise programs of gene expression that govern cell growth and differentiation. Microarray-based gene-expression profiling (GEP) is a powerful tool to globally analyze these changes to study cancer biology and clinical behavior. Despite overwhelming genomic chaos in multiple myeloma (MM), expression patterns within tumor samples are remarkably stable and reproducible. Unique expression patterns associated with recurrent chromosomal translocations and ploidy changes defined molecular classes with differing clinical features and outcomes. Combined molecular techniques also dissected two distinct, reproducible forms of hyperdiploid disease and have molecularly defined MM with high risk for poor clinical outcome. GEP is now used to risk-stratify patients with newly diagnosed MM. Groups with high-risk features are evident in all GEP-defined MM classes, and GEP studies of serial samples showed that risk increases over time, with relapsed disease showing dramatic GEP shifts toward a signature of poor outcomes. This suggests a common mechanism of disease evolution and potentially reflects preferential expansion of therapy-resistant cells. Correlating GEP-defined disease class and risk with outcomes of therapeutic regimens reveals class-specific benefits for individual agents, as well as mechanistic insights into drug sensitivity and resistance. Here, we review modern genomics contributions to understanding MM pathogenesis, prognosis, and therapy. Leukemia (2009) 23, 1941-1956; doi: 10.1038/leu. 2009.160; published online 6 August 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据