4.7 Article

Antiepileptic drugs reduce efficacy of methotrexate chemotherapy by downregulation of Reduced folate carrier transport activity

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1087-1097

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.6

关键词

drug resistance; methotrexate; antiepileptic drugs; reduced folate carrier; transport; regulation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HO 2103/2-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concurrent treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and antiepileptic drugs, such as phenobarbital (PB), reduces the efficacy of MTX chemotherapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This can result from defective Reduced folate carrier (Rfc1)-dependent cellular uptake of MTX. Indeed, we have shown that functional Rfc1 activity is significantly reduced by clinically relevant concentrations of the anticonvulsant drugs PB or carbamazepine in an adequate in vitro model. As PB is known to regulate carrier-associated transport by the nuclear receptor constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), we investigated the involvement of the CAR signaling cascade and the mode of PB-induced downregulation of Rfc1 activity. CAR activation by PB or the CAR agonist 1,4-bis[2-(3,5-dichloropyridyloxy)]benzene resulted in translocation of Ca2+-dependent protein kinase C alpha (cPKC alpha) to the plasma membrane related to significantly elevated PKC activities. In contrast, subcellular localization of Ca2+-independent PKC delta was only marginally altered. Studies on intracellular distribution of the Rfc1 protein indicated that PB-induced activation of cPKCa was associated with carrier internalization from the plasma membrane into the cytosol independent of the Rfc1 phosphorylation status. In conclusion, we identified for the first time the molecular mechanism of this clinically relevant drug resistance in patients with ALL concurrently receiving MTX chemotherapy and antiepileptic drugs. Leukemia (2009) 23, 1087-1097; doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.6; published online 12 February 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据