4.7 Article

Blockade of mTOR signaling potentiates the ability of histone deacetylase inhibitor to induce growth arrest and differentiation of acute myelogenous leukemia cells

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 2159-2168

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.243

关键词

histone deacetylase inhibitor; mTOR; differentiation; apoptosis; C/EBP epsilon

资金

  1. Kanae Foundation
  2. Kochi University
  3. NIH
  4. Sheryl Weissberg Lymphoma Foundation
  5. Parker Hughes Trust
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that MS-275, a novel synthetic benzamide histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI), blocked Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) HL60 and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) NB4 cells, as assessed by decreased levels of the phosphorylated (p)-Akt, p-p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K) and p-S6K by western blot analysis. Interestingly, further inactivation of mTOR by rapamycin analog RAD001 (everolimus) significantly enhanced MS-275-mediated growth inhibition and apoptosis of these cells in parallel with enhanced upregulation of p27(kip1) and downregulation of c-Myc. In addition, RAD001 potentiated the ability of MS-275 to induce differentiation of HL60 and NB4 cells, as measured by the expression of CD11b cell surface antigens, as well as reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium. Importantly, RAD001 potentiated the ability of MS-275 to induce the expression of the myeloid differentiation-related transcription factor, CCAAT enhancer-binding protein-epsilon, in these cells in association with enhanced acetylation of histone H3 on its promoter. Furthermore, RAD001 (5 mg/kg) significantly enhanced the effects of MS-275 (10 mg/kg) to inhibit proliferation of HL60 tumor xenografts in nude mice without adverse effects. Taken together, concomitant administration of an HDACI and an mTOR inhibitor may be a promising treatment strategy for the individuals with a subset of human leukemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据