4.7 Article

BCL-2 phosphorylation modulates sensitivity to the BH3 mimetic GX15-070 (Obatoclax) and reduces its synergistic interaction with bortezomib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 1712-1720

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2008.175

关键词

Obatoclax; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; BCL-2 phosphorylation; bortezomib

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [SAF 06/8850]
  2. Lymphoma Research Foundation
  3. European Commission [SLMM-CT-2004503351, RED 2006-20-014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell lymphoid neoplasm with deregulated apoptosis and overexpression of several antiapoptotic BCL-2 proteins. GX15-070/Obatoclax is a small-molecule BH3 mimetic compound that has shown activity against several hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. In the present work, we report that GX15-070 led to the disruption of BCL-2/BIM and MCL-1/BAK complexes in CLL cells, followed by the activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. CLL cells showed lower sensitivity to GX15-070 than primary mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) ones, in correlation with higher levels of phosphorylated BCL-2 at serine 70 residue (pBCL-2(Ser70)) in CLL cells. Decrease in BCL-2 phosphorylation by extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 inhibition increased CLL sensitivity to GX15-070, while blocking BCL-2 dephosphorylation using a PP2A antagonist reduced the activity of this BH3 mimetic. GX15-070 activity was increased by cotreatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. However, as proteasome inhibition led to the accumulation of phosphorylated BCL-2, the degree of interaction between GX15-070 and bortezomib was regulated by basal pBCL-2(Ser70) levels. These results support the role of BCL-2 phosphorylation as a mechanism of resistance to BH3 mimetic compounds, and demonstrate that combination approaches including ERK inhibitors could enhance BH3 mimetics activity both alone or in combination with proteasome inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据