4.3 Article

Unsuitable distinction between viable and dead Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis by ethidium bromide monoazide

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 633-638

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02585.x

关键词

bacterial viability; ethidium bromide monoazide; real-time polymerase chain reaction; Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcus epidermidis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The DNA-intercalating dye ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) has recently been used as a DNA binding agent to differentiate viable and dead bacterial cells by selectively penetrating through the damaged membrane of dead cells and blocking the DNA amplification during the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We optimized and tested the assay in vitro using Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis cultures to distinguish viable from dead bacteria, with the goal of reducing false positive PCR results. Viable and heat-inactivated bacteria were treated with EMA or left untreated before DNA extraction. A real-time PCR assay for the detection of the tuf gene in each DNA extract was used. Our results indicated that EMA influenced viable bacteria as well as dead bacteria, and the effect of EMA depended on the EMA concentration and bacterial number. EMA is not a suitable indicator of bacterial viability, at least with respect to Staphylococcus species. Determining the viability of pathogens has a major impact on interpreting the results of molecular tests for bacteria and subsequent clinical management of patients. To this end, several methods are being evaluated. One of these methods - intercalating DNA of dead bacteria by EMA - looked very promising, but our study found it unsatisfactory for S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据