4.3 Article

Development of a sequence-characterized amplified region marker for diagnosis of dwarf bunt of wheat and detection of Tilletia controversa Kuhn

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 235-240

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02645.x

关键词

amplified fragment length polymorphism; dwarf bunt of wheat; PCR; sequence-characterized amplified region; Tilletia controversa Kuhn

资金

  1. National Basic Research and Development Program of China [2009CB119200]
  2. National Key Technologies Research and Development Program [2006BAD08A14]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [2130108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Dwarf bunt of wheat, caused by Tilletia controversa Kuhn, is a destructive disease on wheat as well as an important international quarantined disease in many countries. The objective of this investigation was to develop a diagnostic molecular marker generated from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for rapid identification of T. controversa. Methods and Results: A total of 30 primer combinations were tested by AFLP to detect DNA polymorphisms between T. controversa and related species. The primer combination E08/M02 generated a polymorphic pattern displaying a 451-bp DNA fragment specific for T. controversa. The marker was converted into a sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR), and specific primers (SC-01(49)/SC-02(415)), designed for use in PCR detection assays, amplified a unique DNA fragment in all isolates of T. controversa, but not in the related pathogens. The detection limit with the primer set SC-01(49)/SC-02(415) was 10 ng of DNA which could be obtained from 11 mu g of teliospores in a 25-mu l PCR reaction. Conclusions: An approach to distinguish T. controversa from similar pathogenic fungi has been developed based on the use of a SCAR marker. Significance and Impact of the Study: Development of the simple, high throughput assay kit for the rapid diagnosis of dwarf bunt of wheat and detection of T. controversa is anticipated in further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据