4.4 Article

Induction of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Bone Marrow by Low-Level Laser Therapy Has Profound Beneficial Effects on the Infarcted Rat Heart

期刊

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 401-409

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.21063

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells (MSC); low-level laser therapy (LLLT); myocardial infarction (MI); c-kit plus cells

资金

  1. Nicholas and Elizabeth Shlezak Super Center for Cardiac Research and Biomedical Engineering at Tel Aviv University
  2. Tel-Aviv University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives: The adult mammalian heart is known to have a very limited regenerative capacity following acute ischemia. In this study we investigated the hypothesis that photobiostimulation of autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by low-level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to the bone marrow (BM), may migrate to the infarcted area and thus attenuate the scarring processes following myocardial infarction (MI). Materials and Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats underwent experimental MI. LLLT (Ga-Al-As diode laser, power density 10 mW/cm(2), for 100 seconds) was then applied to the BM of the exposed tibia at different time intervals post-MI (20 minutes and 4 hours). Sham-operated infarcted rats served as control. Results: Infarct size and ventricular dilatation were significantly reduced (76% and 75%, respectively) in the laser-treated rats 20 minutes post-MI as compared to the control-non-treated rats at 3 weeks post-MI. There was also a significant 25-fold increase in cell density of c-kit+ cells in the infarcted area of the laser-treated rats (20 minutes post-MI) as compared to the non-laser-treated controls. Conclusion: The application of LLLT to autologous BM of rats post-MI offers a novel approach to induce BM-derived MSCs, which are consequently recruited from the circulation to the infarcted heart and markedly attenuate the scarring process post-MI. Lasers Surg. Med. 43:401-409, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据