4.2 Article

Constraints on paleoclimate from 11.5 to 5.0 ka from shoreline dating and hydrologic budget modeling of Baqan Tso, southwestern Tibetan Plateau

期刊

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
卷 83, 期 1, 页码 80-93

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2014.07.011

关键词

Tibetan Plateau; Paleolake; Carbon-14 dating; Holocene; Shoreline dating; Paleohydrologic model; Precipitation; Monsoon

资金

  1. Comer Science and Education Foundation
  2. Geological Society of America Graduate Student Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C-14 dating of shoreline deposits of closed-basin lake Baqan Tso in the western Tibetan Plateau shows that lake level regressed from the undated highstand (46 m above modern, 4.3 x modern surface area) of likely earliest Holocene age by 11.5 ka, and remained larger than modern until at least approximate to 5.0 ka. The shoreline record broadly matches other regional climate records, with lake level closely following Northern Hemisphere summer insolation overprinted by sub-millennial lake-level oscillations. A model coupling modem land runoff and lake surface heat closely reproduces estimated modem precipitation of approximate to 240 mm/yr. We estimate that the Baqan Tso basin required approximate to 380 mm/yr precipitation to sustain the maximum early Holocene lake area, a 55% increase over modem. Precipitation increases, not glacial meltwater, drove lake-level changes, as Baqan Tso basin was not glaciated during the Holocene. Our estimate assumes early Holocene insolation (approximate to 1.3% overall increase), and mean annual increases of 2 degrees C in temperature, and 37% in relative humidity. We additionally developed a Holocene precipitation history for Baqan Tso using dated paleolake areas. Using the modern and early Holocene model results as end-members, we estimate precipitation in the western Tibetan Plateau which was 300-380 mm/yr between 5.0 and 11.5 ka, with error of +/- 29-57 mm/yr (+/- 12-15%). (C) 2014 University of Washington. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据