4.5 Article

Effect of the 532nm pulsed KTP laser in the treatment of Reinke's edema

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 122, 期 12, 页码 2786-2792

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23576

关键词

Vocal Folds; vocal cords; Reinke's edema; polypoid degeneration; KTP laser; Potassium; Titanyl Phosphate laser; dysphonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis: To evaluate the effect and safety of the 532nm Pulsed Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate (KTP) laser in the office-based treatment of patients with Reinke's edema using objective and subjective scaled outcome measures. Study Design: Case Series. Setting: Tertiary hospital center. Subjects: Seven adult females undergoing in-office KTP laser treatment for Reinke's edema. Methods: Participants were studied pre- and posttreatment. Vocal function was evaluated by objective aerodynamic and acoustic analysis. Subjective changes were evaluated using the GRBAS scale, Voice Handicap Index, and videostroboscopy. Histologic effects of the laser were investigated by comparing one patient treated with laser one year prior to excision, one treated with laser just prior to excision, and one control patient who underwent excision without prior laser treatment. Results: At an average postoperative follow up of 17.8 weeks (range 578), maximum phonation time trended toward improvement. The median VHI score decreased from 37 to 26 (p=0.150). There was a reduction in each component of the GRBAS scoring and the median fundamental frequency increased from 162 to 186 (p=0.625). Stroboscopic findings demonstrated an intact posttreatment mucosal wave. Histologic comparison of the tissue effects of laser in three patients demonstrated changes in vocal fold vascularity but no acute or long-term damage to the overlying epithelium. Conclusion: Objective and subjective scaled measures suggest that treatment of Reinke's edema in the office with a 532nm KTP laser may result in improved voice. It appears safe with histologic preservation of the vocal fold vibratory epithelium and persistence of mucosal wave. Laryngoscope, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据