4.5 Article

Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Clinic and Adherence with Speech Pathology

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 121, 期 10, 页码 2131-2135

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lary.21746

关键词

Multidisciplinary care; head and neck cancer; patient compliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the effect of referral patterns on compliance with speech-language pathology (SLP) treatment of voice and swallowing difficulties in patients with head and neck cancer (HNCA). Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal HNCA referred for pretreatment SLP evaluation comprised the study population. Compliance was measured by participation in SLP therapy during and after head and neck treatment, as well as by the number of missed and completed visits. Outcomes were compared between patients who were initially evaluated through the multidisciplinary clinic and those evaluated outside of the multidisciplinary clinic format. Results: The final study sample included 118 individuals with oropharyngeal tumors. All patients were treated with primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Patients evaluated initially through the multidisciplinary clinic had more SLP visits than those who did not participate in the multidisciplinary clinic (mean 1.8 vs. 0.2, P <. 0001). Participation in SLP treatment was significantly greater for patients >= 60 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, P= .032) and for patients who participated in the multidisciplinary clinic (OR = 19.3, P <. 0001). Tumor stage, sex, race, marital status, and insurance status were not associated with patient compliance. Multivariate analysis revealed that participation in a multidisciplinary clinic was the only significant variable associated with SLP treatment compliance (OR 12.9, P <. 0001), after controlling for all other variables. Conclusions: Patients evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic are more likely to comply with SLP treatment recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据