4.5 Article

Quality of Life Following Nasal Surgery

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 120, 期 4, 页码 826-831

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.20824

关键词

Nasal surgery; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis: This prospective study aimed to investigate changes in quality of life (QOL) after nasal surgery. Study Design: Prospective study Methods: A total of 788 patients (492 Men and 296 women; age range, 9-81 years; mean age, 41 years) were included in this prospective study. Three hundred thirty-six patients received sinus surgery, 358 received septum surgery, and 94 additional patients received sinus surgery involving the septum. QOL was assessed with a standardized questionnaire for general health and well-being (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36]). Additionally, subjective sinunasal impairment was collected using the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSBI). QOL and subjective sinunasal impairment were retested 4 months after surgery (63-339 days after surgery, mean, 128 days) in 361 patients. Results: In the RSBI severity scale, 29.5% of the patients rated their sinunasal problems presurgery to be of high severity, 61.2% rated them as medium, and 9.3% as minor. Postsurgery, 2.8% of the patients rated the severity of their sinunasal problems high, 35% medium, and 62.2% minor Subjective improvement of symptoms was found in more than 80% of the patients. Presurgery, general QOL (SF-36) was impaired in sinus patients and improved significantly after surgery. For most septum patients we found relatively little impact of sinunasal disease on general QOL (SF-36) compared to the German normative sample. Conclusions: Functional endoscopic surgery seems to be a good technique for reducing sinunasal symptomatology in the majority of patients. It appears to enhance QOL in those patients who were I severely affected beforehand. Long-term investigations are currently underway to further explore the patients' subjective QOL following nasal surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据