4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Scaffold-Free Tissue-Engineered Cartilage Implants for Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 120, 期 3, 页码 612-617

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.20750

关键词

Laryngotracheal reconstruction; cartilage implant; tissue engineering; subglottic stenosis; scaffold free

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P01 AR053622] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE0153322, R01 DE015322] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives/Hypothesis: Donor site morbidity, including pneumothorax, can be a considerable problem when harvesting cartilage grafts for laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR). Tissue engineered cartilage may offer a solution to this problem. This study investigated the feasibility of using autologous chondrocytes to tissue-engineer scaffold-free cartilage grafts for LTR in rabbits to avoid degradation that often arises from an inflammatory reaction to scaffold carrier matrix. Study Design: Animal study. Methods: Auricular cartilage was harvested from seven New Zealand white rabbits, the chondrocytes expanded and loaded onto a custom-made bioreactor for 7 to 8 weeks to fabricate autologous scaffold-free cartilage sheets. The sheets were cut to size and used for LTR, and the rabbits were sacrificed 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the LTR and prepared for histology. Results: None of the seven rabbits showed signs of respiratory distress. A smooth, noninflammatory scar was visible intraluminally; the remainder of the tracheal lumen was unremarkable. Histologically, the grafts showed no signs of degradation or inflammatory reaction, were covered with mucosal epithelium, but did show signs of mechanical failure at the implantation site. Conclusions: These results show that autologous chondrocytes can be used to fabricate an implantable sheet of cartilage that retains a cartilage phenotype, becomes integrated, and does not produce a significant inflammatory reaction. These findings suggest that with the design of stronger implants, these implants can be successfully used as a graft for LTR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据