4.2 Article

Comparison of paired quartz OSL and feldspar post-IR IRSL dose distributions in poorly bleached fluvial sediments from South Africa

期刊

QUATERNARY GEOCHRONOLOGY
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 233-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.02.015

关键词

Optically stimulated luminescence; Post-IR infrared stimulated luminescence; Incomplete bleaching; Fluvial sediments

资金

  1. Aberystwyth University
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/G524301/1]
  3. Geological Society of South Africa (GSSA) Research, Education and Investment Fund
  4. Quaternary Research Association (QRA) New Research Workers' Award
  5. Department of Geography and Earth Sciences at Aberystwyth University
  6. NERC [NE/G524301/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative study using quartz optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and feldspar post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence (post-IR IRSL) was undertaken on Quaternary fluvial sediments from an unnamed tributary of the Moopetsi River in South Africa. The aim is to assess whether the post-IR IRSL signal can be used to date incompletely bleached sediments. Several post-IR IRSL signals using varying stimulation and preheat temperatures were investigated; of these the post-IR IRSL225 signal was deemed most appropriate for dating because it bleached most rapidly. The feldspar post-IR IRSL225 equivalent dose (D-e) values from this site are consistently larger than those from quartz OSL, probably due to differences in the bleaching characteristics of the two signals. Additionally, the post-IR IRSL225 D-e values within a sample showed less variation in precision than the quartz D-e data, possibly due to greater averaging between grains in the feldspar small aliquots. The agreement between ages based on the OSL and post-IR IRSL225 signals was better for younger samples (<20 ka) than for older ones (>50 ka); the cause of this variation is unclear. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据