4.6 Article

Integrated Solid-State Nanopore Electrochemistry Array for Sensitive, Specific, and Label-Free Biodetection

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 34, 期 49, 页码 14787-14795

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB932600]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0208000, 2016YFF0100800]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21525523, 21722507, 21574048, 81302743, 21665004, 21605053]
  4. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2018GXNSFAA138022]
  5. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation, China [151011]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570637]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanopore ionic current measurement is currently a prevailing readout and offers considerable opportunities for bioassays. Extending conventional electrochemistry to nanoscale space, albeit noteworthy, remains challenging. Here, we report a versatile electrochemistry array established on a nanofluidic platform by controllably depositing gold layers on the two outer sides of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) nanopores, leading to form an electrochemical microdevice capable of performing amperometry in a label-free manner. Electroactive species ferricyanide ions passing through gold-decorated nanopores act as electrochemical indicator to generate electrolytic current signal. The electroactive species flux that dominates current signal response is closely related to the nanopore permeability. Such well-characteristic electrolytic current-species flux correlation lays a premise for quantitative electrochemical analysis. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, we preliminarily verify the analytical utility by detection of nucleic acid and protein at picomolar concentration levels. Universal surface modification and molecule assembly, specific target recognition and reliable signal output in nanopore enable direct electrochemical detection of biomolecules without the need of cumbersome probe labeling and signal amplification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据