4.6 Article

Dispersed-Nanoparticle Loading Synthesis for Monodisperse Au-Titania Composite Particles and Their Crystallization for Highly Active UV and Visible Photocatalysts

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 30, 期 24, 页码 7244-7250

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la5012499

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JSPS KAKENHI) [23246134, 23681020, 24651112, 25600001]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25600001, 24651112] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Submicrometer-sized amorphous titania spheres incorporating Au nanoparticles (NPs) were prepared titanium(IV) isopropoxide in the presence of chloroauric acid in a one-pot synthesis consisting of a sol gel reaction of and a successive reduction with sodium borohydride in a mixed solvent of ethanol/acetonitrile. The synthesis was allowed to prepare monodisperse titania spheres that homogeneously incorporated Au NPs with sizes of ca. 7 nm. The Au NP-loaded titania spheres underwent different crystallization processes, including 500 degrees C calcination in air, high-temperature hydrothermal treatment (HHT), and/or low-temperature hydrothermal treatment (LHT). Photocatalytic experiments were conducted with the Au NP-loaded crystalline titania spheres under irradiation of UV and visible light. A combined process of LHT at 80 degrees C followed by calcination at 500 degrees C could effectively crystallize titania spheres maintaining the dispersion state of Au NPs, which led to photocatalytic activity higher than that of commercial P25 under UV irradiation. Under visible light irradiation, the Au NP-titania spheres prepared with a crystallization process of LHT at 80 degrees C for 6 h showed photocatalytic activity much higher than a commercial product of visible light photocatalyst. Structure analysis of the visible light photocatalysts indicates the importance of prevention of the Au NPs aggregation in the crystallization processes for enhancement of photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据