4.6 Article

Photoresponsive Block Copolymer: Synthesis, Characterization, and Surface Activity Control

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 30, 期 14, 页码 3957-3966

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la4049677

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20106006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amphiphilic block copolymers bearing chromophores are used to achieve photoresponses upon exposure to suitable light, which alter molecular properties, but the photostimulus surface activity control of amphiphilic block copolymers remains to be elucidated. In this work, a series of novel amphiphilic block copolymers consisting of a carboxymethyl betaine monomer (called GLBT) and 4-ethoxy-4'-methacrylamide (EMAAB) with different block ratios have been synthesized using a reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization process. Copolymers were observed to be self-assembled in the aqueous solution above a critical micelle concentration, which was determined by static light scattering measurements and formed vesicles of 120-170 nm in diameter, at different pH values. Copolymers were found to be surface-active at pH 7 but exhibited non-surface activity at acidic and alkaline pH values. After being irradiated with 360 nm UV light, copolymers showed a significant photoresponse both at the surface and in bulk solution as a result of the photoinduced isomerization of azochromophores. The surface property of copolymers was significantly affected by UV irradiation at pH 7, and block copolymers became non-surface-active. The bulk properties changed considerably upon UV exposure where polymer vesicles transformed to micelles as a result of the polarity difference between two azo isomers (cis and trans isomers). All of these transitions were found to be reversible. A new method to control the surface active/nonactive and vesicle/micelle transitions by light and pH has been established by introducing an azobenzene chromophore and GLBT into amphiphlic diblock copolymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据