4.6 Article

Effects of Formation Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties, Aggregation, and Phase Transformation of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 1069-1076

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la3034319

关键词

-

资金

  1. Washington University
  2. Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award
  3. National Science Foundation's Environmental Chemical Sciences Program [CHE-1214090]
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-00538541]
  5. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1214090] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, hematite transformation from a precursor 6-line ferrihydrite phase was investigated by systematically altering the forced hydrolysis hematite synthesis. Specifically, we used a combination of in situ and ex situ characterization techniques to examine the effects of varying the Fe-III injection rates and cooling methods on the hematite and 6-line ferrihydrite nanoparticle size, isoelectric point, mineral phase, and aggregation. Finally, As(V) adsorption experiments were performed to determine how the two iron oxide phases existed in the reaction system. Nanoparticle synthesis thermodynamics and kinetics were found to control the extent of distinct 6-line ferrihydrite phases in the iron oxide nanoparticle solutions, as well as the particle size and isoelectric point. Conversion of 6-line ferrihydrite to hematite was greatly influenced by the degree of aggregation (determined by synthesis conditions) during drying. As(V) adsorption experiments revealed that 6-line ferrihydrite and hematite exist as a linear combination of two separate phases. These results provide unique information regarding how in situ iron oxide nanoparticle properties can direct their ex situ behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据