4.6 Article

One-Pot Synthesis of Mesoporous Silica Nanocarriers with Tunable Particle Sizes and Pendent Carboxylic Groups for Cisplatin Delivery

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 403-410

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la3036264

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB933602]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090074120009]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [51072053, 21001043]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WD 1114004]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13zz040]
  6. Nano-Special Foundation for Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [12 nm0502600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous silica nanocarriers with tunable particle sizes and different loadings of pendent carboxylic groups were successfully prepared by a straightforward and reproducible strategy, in which carboxyethylsilanetriol sodium salt was co-condensed with tetraethoxyorthosilicate to introduce the carboxylic groups. The key in this strategy was to separate the synthesis process into two steps of the nuclei formation and particle growth. The uniform particle size and ordered structure of the synthesized nanocarriers were manifested by several techniques such as XRD, TEM, SEM, and BET. DLS measurement illustrated that nanocarriers could be well suspended in aqueous solution. The integration and content tunability of the carboxylic groups within mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) were verified by FT-IR and Si-29 NMR The inherent carboxylic units on the obtained carboxylic group modified MSNs (MSNs-C) effectively enhanced the capture and tailored the release properties of the anticancer drug of cisplatin. The accumulation of drug in the HeLa cells was greatly enhanced due to the highly efficient platinum uptake efficiency transported by the synthesized nanocarriers. The drug encapsulated in the MSNs-C exhibited a higher antitumor activity than free cisplatin against both MCF-7 and HeLa cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据