4.6 Article

DLVO-Based Estimates of Adsorbed Water Film Thicknesses in Geologic CO2 Reservoirs

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 28, 期 21, 页码 8001-8009

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la2044587

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Nanoscale Control of Geologic CO2, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO(2)) is injected into deep subsurface reservoirs, much of the affected volume consists of pores containing both water and scCO(2), with water films remaining as the mineral-wetting phase. Although water films can affect multiphase flow and mediate reactions at mineral surfaces, little is known about how film thicknesses depend on system properties. Here, the thicknesses of water films were estimated on the basis of considerations of capillary pressure needed for the entry of CO2 and disjoining pressures in films resulting from van der Waals and electric double-layer interactions. Depth-dependent CO2 and water properties were used to estimate Hamaker constants for water films on silica and smectite surfaces under CO2 confinement. Dispersion interactions were combined with approximate solutions to the electric double layer film thickness-pressure relationship in a Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) analysis, with CO2 as the confining fluid. Under conditions of elevated pressure, temperature, and salinity commonly associated with CO2 sequestration, adsorbed water films in reservoir rock surfaces are typically predicted to be less than 10 nm in thickness. Decreased surface charge of silica under the acidic pH of CO2-equilibrated water and elevated salinity is predicted to compress the electric double layer substantially, such that the dispersion contribution to the film thickness is dominant. Relative to silica, smectite surfaces are predicted to support thicker water films under CO2 confinement because of greater electrostatic and dispersion stabilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据