4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 nanostructure films and their photoelectrochemical properties

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 358, 期 -, 页码 418-424

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.212

关键词

TiO2; Nanostructure; Film; Photoelectrochemistry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372201, 21476183]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2015JM5159]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20136101110009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, anatase TiO2 nanostructured films were successfully prepared via Ti foil-assisted hydrothermal synthesis method without any surfactants. With the increase of hydrothermal time from 3 to 12 h, the surface morphologies of the films changed from nanotubes to nanoflowers and the thickness of the films increased from 2.5 to 4.2 mu m. The nanoflowers were seated on a layer of oriented nanotubes and consisted of nanosheets. Both nanotubes and nanosheets were multi-walled, comprising interconnected [TiO6] octahedra. Ti foil and acid-treated Ti foil both formed pieces of thin films on the surface with nanotubes and nanoflowers, respectively. Photoelectrochemistry tests showed that the photocurrent response of the nanotube film was nearly 13.8 mu A/cm(2), which was approximately three times higher than that of nanoflowers film. This indicates that the nanotubes more successfully transferred electrons to the surface of the film as a result of nanotubes providing direct pathways for electrons from the point of injection to the Ti foil electrode. The ultraviolet (UV)-visible-near infrared (NIR) absorption spectra indicated that the nanotube film had a narrower band gap as compared to the nanoflower film. In other words, a relatively low hydrothermal treatment temperature or relatively short hydrothermal treatment time is better for preparing excellent photocurrent response films. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据