4.6 Article

Cationic Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Block Copolymer Adsorption Investigated by Dual Polarization Interferometry and Lattice Mean-Field Theory

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 28, 期 39, 页码 14028-14038

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la302154p

关键词

-

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [1777665/V50, 190403]
  2. VINNOVA through a VINNMER [P38574-1]
  3. Swedish Research Council (VR) through the Linnaeus Center of Excellence Organizing Molecular Matter [239-2009-6794, 621-2011-3309]
  4. EU [290251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of cationic diblock copolymers, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)(48)-block-poly((3-acrylamidopropyl)trimethylammonium chloride)(x), abbreviated as PNIPAAM(48)-b-PAMPTMA(X)(+) (X = 0, 6, 10, 14, and 20), has been synthesized, and their adsorption onto silicon oxynitride from aqueous solution has been investigated using dual polarization interferometry. The polymer adsorption was modeled by using a lattice mean-field theory, and a satisfactory consistency between theory and experiments was found in terms of surface excess and layer thickness. Both theory and experiments show that the adsorption is limited by steric repulsion for X < X-max and by electrostatic interactions for X > X-max Modeling demonstrates that significant surface charge regulation occurs due to adsorption. Both the nonionic and cationic block exhibit nonelectrostatic affinity to silicon oxynitride and thus contribute to the driving force for adsorption, and modeling is used for clarifying how changes in the nonelectrostatic affinity affects the surface excess. The segments of the nonionic and cationic blocks seem less segregated when both have a nonelectrostatic affinity for the surface compared to the case where the segments had no surface affinity. Adsorption kinetics was investigated experimentally. Two kinetic regimes were observed: the adsorption rate is initially controlled by the mass transfer rate to the surface and at higher coverage is limited by the attachment rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据