4.6 Article

Organogels Based on J- and H-Type Aggregates of Amphiphilic Perylenetetracarboxylic Diimides

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 3074-3082

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la104888p

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20771066, 20871055]
  2. Ministry of Education of China
  3. Shandong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three new perylenetetracarboxylic diimide (PDI) compounds substituted with hydrophobic and/or hydrophilic groups at the two imide nitrogen positions, namely N,N'-di[N-(4-aminophenyl)-3,4,5-tris(2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)benzamide]-1,7-di(4-tert-butyl- phenoxy)perylene-3,4;9,10-tetracarboxylic diimide (1), N, N'-di [N-amido-3,4,5-tris (2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy) ethoxy)benzamide]-1,7-di(4-tert-butylphenoxy)perylene-3,4; 9,10-tetracarboxylic diimide (2), and N-amido-3,4,5-tris (2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)benzamide-N'-amido-3,4,5-tris(dodecyloxy)benzamide-1,7-di(4-tert-butylphenoxy)perylene-3,4;9,10-tetracarboxylate diimide (3), have been designed and prepared. The gelating abilities of them in different solvents have been investigated, and the results indicated that compounds 1 and 3 can form fluorescent gels whereas compound 2 cannot. The properties of the gels of compounds 1 and 3 have been investigated by UV-vis absorption and emission spectra. The results indicate that the gel of compound 1 is composed of H-aggregates, whereas the gel of compound 3 is composed of J-aggregates. The reversible transformation between gel and solution states induced by temperature change is observed. The structure of dried gel has been investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments, and the morphology has been measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM). This research revealed successfully the crucial roles of amphiphilic properties and the side-chain conformations in controlling the gelating properties of PDI molecules. This information may be useful for the design of novel organogels based on perylenetetracarboxylic diimides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据