4.6 Article

Self-Assembly of Short Aβ(16-22) Peptides: Effect of Terminal Capping and the Role of Electrostatic Interaction

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 2723-2730

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la1034273

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20773164, 20906105]
  2. Royal Society (London)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the characterization of self-assembly of two short P-amyloid (A beta) peptides (16-22), KLVFFAE and Ac-KLVFFAE-NH2, focusing on examining the effect of terminal capping. At pH 2.0, TEM and AFM imaging revealed that the uncapped peptide self-assembled into long, straight, and unbranched nanofibrils with a diameter of 3.8 +/- 1.0 nm while the capped one formed nanotapes with a width of 70.0 +/- 25.0 nm. CD analysis indicated the formation of beta-sheet structures in both aggregated systems, but the characteristic CD peaks were less intense and less red-shifted for the uncapped than the capped one, indicative of weaker hydrogen bonding and weaker pi-pi stacking. Fluorescence and rheological measurements also confirmed stronger intermolecular attraction associated with the capped nanotapes. At acidic pH 2, each uncapped KLVFFAE molecule carries two positive charges at the N-terminus, and the strong electrostatic repulsion favors interfacial curving and twisting within the beta-sheet, causing weakening of hydrogen bonds and pi-pi stacking. In contrast, capping reduces the charge by half, and intermolecular electrostatic repulsion is drastically reduced. As a result, the lateral attraction of beta-sheets favors stronger lamellar structuring, leading to the formation of rather flat nanotapes. Flat tapes with similar morphological structure were also formed by the capped peptide at pH 12.0 where the charge on the capping end was reversed. This study has thus demonstrated how self-assembled nanostructures of small peptides can be manipulated through simple molecular structure design and tuning of electrostatic interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据