4.6 Article

Preparation and Characterization of a Solid Amine Adsorbent for Capturing CO2 by Grafting Allylamine onto PAN Fiber

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 13897-13902

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la101281v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [200805580007]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong province [2008B010600039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid amine adsorbents using synthetic fibers instead of silica as the matrix are expected to offer more benefits for the adsorption of CO2 because of high external surface area, low pressure drops, and flexibility of the matrix fibers. A novel kind of solid amine-containing fibrous adsorbent (PAN-AF) was prepared by preirradiation grafting copolymerization of allylamine onto polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fiber, using the redox system of (NH4)(2)S2O8/NaHSO3 as initiator. The effects of the reaction conditions such as reaction time, temperature, monomer concentration, amount of the initiator on grafting degree were studied. The results showed that the optimal conditions for the grafting copolymerization were using 50% allylamine monomer (V/V) and 1.5% (W/V) initiator and reacting at 100 degrees C for 10 h. FTIR was employed to characterize the corresponding changes on the surface chemical structure of PAN and PAN-AF. Thermal gravimetric analysis was used to evaluate the thermal stability of the materials. Equilibrium adsorption capacities for CO2 and regeneration behaviors of PAN-AF were determined. Adsorption capacity for CO2 of PAN-AF with 60.0 wt % grafting degree was 6.22 mmol CO2/g PAN-AF. PAN-AF could be completely regenerated by heating in boiling water for 30 min. The CO2 adsorption performance of the regenerated PAN-AF was almost the same as that of the fresh adsorbent after several cycles, which revealed that PAN-AF exhibited good regenerating stability. The high speed and effective regeneration process proves that PAN-AF has great potential in industrial applications for CO2 capture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据