4.6 Article

Characteristics of Hydrogen Storage by Spillover on Pt-Doped Carbon and Catalyst-Bridged Metal Organic Framework

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 26, 期 14, 页码 11963-11971

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la101377u

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  2. NSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal dispersion is a crucially important factor for hydrogen spillover storage on metal/carbon materials. For Pt on carbon (Pt/C), dispersion into nearly 2 nm clusters or nanoparticles is necessary to facilitate spillover. On an effective Pt/C spillover sorbent, temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) results reveal the highest hydrogen signal is from the high-energy Pt edges, steps or (110) surfaces, even though the (111) faces are more abundant. Previous theoretical studies showed the high-energy sites (including the 110 face) are by far the most preferred for effective splitting of hydrogen. These are in significantly smaller fractions for larger particles, and thus the larger particles are less efficient. In addition, the rate-limiting step for spillover on effective Pt/C is identified by the susceptibility to isotopic differences, first-order behavior and isolation from catalyzed H-2/HD/D-2 equilibrium measurements; we conclude it is the spillover step or surface diffusion. We extended our analysis to a review of our previous work, spillover on metal organic frameworks (MOFs). This has been achieved by bridging a commercial H-2 dissociation catalyst (Pt/C) to MOFs, large enhancement factors (up to 8) were observed. Unlike Pt/C sorbents, sample-to-sample consistency in storage capacity on the bridged MOF samples is difficult to achieve. Inconsistency in the enhancements by spillover is shown; however, significant enhancement factors are still observed when samples are prepared and activated properly. Common pitfalls (and their consequences) in sample preparation for both Pt/C and bridged MOFs are discussed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据