4.6 Article

Low Viscosity Highly Concentrated Injectable Nonaqueous Suspensions of Lysozyme Microparticles

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 1067-1074

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la9023426

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE987664]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [F1319]
  3. National Institutes of Health [EB008821]
  4. Process Science and Technology Center at the University of Texas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subcutaneous injection of concentrated protein and peptide solutions, in the range or 100-400 mg/mL, is often not possible with a 25- to 27-gauge needle, as the viscosity can be well above 50 cP. Apparent viscosities below this limit are reported for suspensions of milled lysozyme microparticles up to nearly 400 mg/mL in benzyl benzoate or benzyl benzoate mixtures with safflower oils through a syringe with a 25- to 27-gauge needle at room temperature. These apparent viscosities were confirmed using a cone-and-plate rheometer. The intrinsic viscosity regressed from the Kreiger-Dougherty model was only slightly above the Einstein value of 2.5, indicating the increase in viscosity relative to that of the solvent was caused primarily by the excluded volume. Thus, the increases in viscosity from electrical double layer interactions (electroviscous effects), solvation of the particles, or deviations of the particle shape from a spherical geometry were minimal, and much smaller than typically observed for proteins dissolved in aqueous Solutions. The small electroviscous effects are expected given the negligible zeta potential and thin double layers in the low dielectric constant organic solvent. The Suspensions were resuspendable after a year, with essentially constant particle size after two months as measured by static light scattering. The lower apparent viscosities for highly concentrated protein suspensions relative to protein Solutions, coupled With these favorable characteristics upon resuspension, may offer novel opportunities for Subcutaneous injection of therapeutic proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据