4.6 Article

One Pot Hemimicellar Synthesis of Amphiphilic Janus Gold Nanoclusters for Novel Electronic Attributes

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 26, 期 17, 页码 14047-14057

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la102371v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [SR/S2/CMP-57/2006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A one-pot hemimicellar synthesis of oriented, amphiphilic, and fluorescent Janus gold clusters, establishing the Janus character in terms of ligand asymmetry and distribution, has been demonstrated. The method was based on the efficient Langmuir strategy, where the in situ two-dimensional (2D) reduction of Au3+ in the sprayed micellar electrostatic complex, TOA(+)-AuCl4-, was accomplished by subphase tryptophan that acted as the hydrophilic protecting ligand on one hemisphere of the spherical gold cluster. In contrast to the reported micelle-assisted Janus cluster formation, here the cluster growth occurred inside the surface pressure driven hemimicelles, which rapidly formed 2D cluster arrays without any interfacial reorientation. The Janus structure was validated using angle dependent polarized Fourier Transform Infrared Reflection-Absorption Spectroscopy (FT-IRRAS), where orientation dependent vibrational changes in the adsorbed ligand functionalities were detected. Electrochemical impedance measurements of the transferred Janus layers onto hydrophobized ITO revealed the heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant k(ET) to show a clear orientational odd-even parity effect with the odd layers showing much higher rates. Isobaric area relaxation investigations further evidenced toward a hemispherical instantaneous nucleation with edge growth mechanism of the nanoclusters formed at the tryptophan subphase. Surface pressure as a thermodynamic variable effectively controlled the interparticle separation; intercluster electron coupling exhibited insulator-metal transition in the Janus cluster monolayers through scanning electrochemical microscopy investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据