4.6 Article

Antifouling Surface Layers for Improved Signal-to-Noise of Particle-Based Immunoassays

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 25, 期 23, 页码 13510-13515

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la903148n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FF0455861]
  2. National and International Research Alliances Program [RM2007001266]
  3. NCI [NCI P50 CA083636]
  4. Australian Research Council [FF0455861] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 10-fold improvement in the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of an optically encoded silica particle-based immunoassay was achieved through incorporating a protein resistant poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface layer and optimizing antibody immobilization conditions. PEG was activated using 2,2,2-trifluoroethanesulfonyl chloride (tresyl) and required a minimum reaction time of 1.5 h. The activated PEG had a reactive half-life of approximately 5 h when stored in acidified dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). By increasing the protein incubation time and concentration, a maximum antibody loading on the particle surface of 1.6 x 10(-2) Molecules per nm(2) was achieved. The assay S/N ratio was assessed using a multiplexed multicomponent optically encoded species-specific imrnunoassay. Encoded particles were covalently grafted or nonspecifically coated with either bovine or mouse IgG for the simultaneous detection of complementary anti-IgG target or uncomplementary anti-IgG noise. The versatility and potential as a serum-based assay platform was demonstrated by immobilizing either a polyclonal antibody or an engineered single-chain variable fragment (scFv) capture probe on particles for the detection of the ovarian cancer biomarker, mesothelin (MSLN). The MLSN antigen was spiked into PBS buffer or 50% human serum, Both capture probe orientations, and media conditions showed similar low level detection limits of 5 ng/mL; however, a 40% decrease in maximum signal intensity was observed for assays run in 50% serum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据