4.6 Article

Superhydrophobic composite films produced on various substrates

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 24, 期 19, 页码 11225-11232

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la801817e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Greek Ministry of Development (GSRT)
  2. European Social Fund (EU)
  3. Greek State Scholarship Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrophilic silica NOD nanoparticles were dispersed in solutions of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and in solutions of a commercial poly(alkyl siloxane) (Rhodorsil 224), and the suspensions were sprayed on glass surfaces. The effect of the particle concentration on the hydrophobic character of PMMA-SiO2 and Rhodorsil-SiO2 films was investigated and showed the following: (i) Static contact angles (theta(s)), measured on surfaces that were prepared from dilute dispersions (particle concentration < 1 % w/v), increase rapidly with particle concentration and reach maximum values (154 and 164 degrees for PMMA-SiO2 and siloxane-SiO2, respectively). Further increases in particle concentration do not have any effect on theta(s). (ii) The effect of particle concentration on the contact angle hysteresis (theta(A) - theta(R)) is more complicated: as the particle concentration increases, we first notice an increase in hysteresis, which then decreases and finally becomes constant at elevated particle concentrations. The lowest theta(A) - theta(R) values were 5 degrees for PMMA-SiO2 and 3 degrees for siloxane-SiO2, respectively. (iii) SEM and AFM images show that a two-length-scale hierarchical structure is formed on the surface of the superhydrophobic films. It is demonstrated that superhydrophobicity can be achieved using various hydrophilic nanoparticles (alumina and tin oxide nanoparticles were successfully tested) and that the substrate has almost no effect on the hydrophobic character of the applied coatings, which were produced on silicon, concrete, aluminum, silk, wood, marble, and of course glass. The results are discussed in light of Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据