4.6 Article

Probing the interaction between peptides and metal oxides using point mutants of a TiO2-binding peptide

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 24, 期 13, 页码 6852-6857

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la800314p

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1904] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An increasing number of peptides with specific binding affinity to inorganic materials are being isolated using combinatorial peptide libraries without prior knowledge about the interaction between peptides and target materials. The lack of understanding of the mechanism and the contribution of constituent amino acids to the peptides' inorganic-binding ability poses an obstacle to optimizing and tuning of the binding affinity of peptides to inorganic materials and thus hinders the practical application of these peptides. Using the phage surface display technique, we previously identified a disulfide-bond-constrained peptide (-CHKKPSKSC-, STB1) cognitive of TiO2. In the present study, the interaction of STB1 with TiO2 was probed using a series of point mutants of STB1 displayed on phage surfaces. Their binding affinity was measured using a quartz crystal microbalance with energy dissipation measurement and compared on the basis of the Delta f or AD values. The three K residues of STB1 were found to be essential and sufficient for phage particle binding to TiO2. One mutant with five K residues showed not stronger but weaker binding affinity than STB1 due to its conformational restriction, as illustrated by molecular dynamics simulation, to align five K residues in a way conducive to their simultaneous interaction with the TiO2 surface. The contextual influence of noncharged residues on STB1's binding affinity was also investigated. Our results may provide insight into the electrostatic interaction between peptides and inorganic surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据