4.6 Article

Effect of sphingomyelinase-mediated generation of ceramide on aggregation of low-density lipoprotein

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 24, 期 17, 页码 9642-9647

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la800714w

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [5R01 GM071355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the response-to-retention hypothesis. which states that the subendothelial retention of atherogenic lipoproteins is the necessary and sufficient condition for the initiation of atherosclerosis. Here we focus on the relationship between the generation of ceramide in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) phospholipid monolayer and the resulting aggregation of LDL particles. This study provides the first measurement of neutral, Mg2+-dependent Sphingomyelinase (Smase)-mediated ceramide formation from LDL-sphingomyelin and does so for a range of enzyme concentrations (0-0.22 units Smase/mL). The kinetics of ceramide generation was measured using a fluorescence assay for the above enzyme concentrations with a fixed substrate concentration (0.33 mg LDL/mL). The kinetics of LDL aggregate formation was measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS, method of cumulants) for identical enzyme concentrations. Ceramide concentration profiles were fit with a modification of the Michaelis-Menten model (k(a) = 1.11 x 10(-1) mu M-1 min(-1), k(-a) = 6.54 x 10(2) mu M-1 min(-1), k(1) = 3.33 x 10(1) mu M-1 min(-1), k(-1) = 1.41 x 10(-2) min(-1). k(cat) = 8.05 x 10(1) min(-1). K-M = 2.418 mu M, k(deact) = 4.66 x 10(-2) mu M-1 min(-1)) that accounts for the effects of enzyme attachment to the LDL monolayer and for deactivation of Smase due to product inhibition. LDL aggregation is described by a mass action model as explained in previous studies. A key result of this work is the finding that LDL aggregate size depends directly on ceramide concentration and is independent of enzyme concentration. This study demonstrates how principles of colloid science are relevant to important biomedical problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据