4.7 Article

A new landscape index for quantifying urban expansion using multi-temporal remotely sensed data

期刊

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 671-682

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-010-9454-5

关键词

Landscape index; Urban expansion; Multi-temporal; Land use

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40901187]
  2. Key National Natural Science Foundation of China [40830532]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [9451027501002471]
  4. LREIS
  5. CAS [4106298]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Landscape metrics or indices have been commonly used for quantifying landscape patterns. However, most of these indices are generally focused on simple analysis and description of the characterization of the geometric and spatial properties of categorical map patterns. These indices can hardly obtain the information about the spatio-temporal dynamic changes of landscape patterns, especially when multi-temporal remote sensing data are used. In this paper, a new landscape index, i.e., landscape expansion index (LEI), is proposed to solve such problems. In contrast with conventional landscape indices which are capable of reflecting the spatial characteristics for only one single time point, LEI and its variants can capture the information of the formation processes of a landscape pattern. This allows one to quantify the dynamic changes in two or more time points. These proposed indices have been applied to the measurement of the urban expansion of Dongguan in Guangdong province, China, for the period of 1988-2006. The analysis identifies three urban growth types, i.e., infilling, edge-expansion and outlying. A further analysis of different values of LEI in each period reveals a general temporal transition between phases of diffusion and coalescence in urban growth. This implies that the regularity in the spatiotemporal pattern of urban development in Dongguan, is consistent with the explanations according to urban development theories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据