4.5 Article

Fatigue trajectories during the first 8 months after breast cancer diagnosis

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 2671-2679

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1000-0

关键词

Fatigue; Breast cancer; Semiparametric group-based mixture modeling; Anxiety symptoms; Physical activity

资金

  1. Nordic Cancer Union
  2. committee for Psychosocial Cancer Research at Danish Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The objective of this study was to identify distinct groups of fatigue trajectories among women with breast cancer and to evaluate whether age, anxiety symptoms, physical activity, and type of treatment were associated with belonging to the most adverse fatigue group. Methods Women scheduled for breast cancer surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, were consecutively invited to participate in the study (n = 424), resulting in 290 women included in the analyses. Semiparametric group-based mixture modeling was used to identify distinct trajectories of fatigue assessed the week before surgery and 4 and 8 months later. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate differences in the distinct fatigue groups. Results Two distinct groups of fatigue trajectories were identified. One group (21 %) had a high mean level, while the second group (79 %) had a low mean level of fatigue throughout the study. In multivariate analyses, sedentary physical activity (OR 5.78; 95 % CI 1.41-23.75), low physical activity (OR 3.17; 95 % CI 1.15-8.74), and increasing anxiety symptoms (OR 1.23; 95 % CI 1.14-1.33) before surgery were significantly associated with being in the high-fatigue group. Conclusions The results show that one-fifth of women with breast cancer experience continuously high fatigue up to 8 months after surgery and may have been more anxious and physically inactive. This knowledge is important in targeting interventions to women with fatigue throughout their treatment and who do not return to a low fatigue level with existing treatment, self-management, or support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据