4.7 Article

Changes in fox squirrel anti-predator behaviors across the urban-rural gradient

期刊

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 483-493

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-009-9323-2

关键词

Anti-predator behavior; Vigilance; Squirrel; Urban; Urban-rural gradient

资金

  1. Ed Rachel Foundation
  2. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predator stimuli created by humans in the urban environment may alter animals' anti-predator behaviors. I hypothesized that habituation would cause anti-predator behaviors to decrease in urban settings in response to humans. Additionally, I hypothesized that populations habituated to humans would show reduced responses to other predator stimuli. I observed three populations of squirrels (urban, suburban and rural) responses to human approaches, red-tailed hawk vocalizations (Buteo jamaicensis) and coyote (Canis latrans) vocalizations. Mahalanobis distances of anti-predator behaviors in response to human approaches were consistent with the urban-rural gradient. Flight initiation distances (X (2) = 26.33, df = 2, P < 0.001) and amount of time dedicated to anti-predator behavior (X (2) = 10.94, df = 2, P = 0.004) in response to human approaches were also consistent with the urban-rural gradient. Supporting the habituation hypothesis, naive juvenile squirrels increased flight initiation distances (X (2) = 35.89, df = 1, P < 0.001) and time dedicated to anti-predator behaviors (X (2) = 9.46, df = 1, P = 0.002) relative to adult squirrels in the same urban environment. Time dedicated to anti-predator behaviors differed among all three sites in response to both coyote (X (2) = 9.83, df = 2, P = 0.007) and hawk (X (2) = 6.50, df = 2, P = 0.035) vocalizations. Responses to both vocalizations on rural sites (coyote = 45%, hawk = 55%) greater than twice that found on the urban sites (coyote = 11%, hawk = 20%). This is possibly the first case of a transfer of habituation demonstrated under field conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据