4.7 Article

Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 298-303

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.014

关键词

Urbanization; Urban ecology; Ecosystem services; Research questions; Research framework

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [126915]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1639145] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1052875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [126915] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

I use a two-tier approach to structure future research challenges in urban green space ecology. First, questions that are too large for a single country or discipline to address revolve around two issues: (a) how urban green spaces will be affected by socio-demographic and environmental drivers, such as climate change, and (b) how to plan and manage urban green spaces for the benefit of urban dwellers and biodiversity in the face of these changes. Second, questions that have a local origin, but are of international interest deal with, e.g. ecosystem services, urban resilience and human health as well as planning, management and governance of urban green spaces. A research framework for studying these issues should incorporate concepts from natural and social sciences. Ecosystem services approach could form a core of such an framework also integrating the spatial dimension (landscape ecology). Comparative research at the global scale is important to increase our understanding of the variation in urban green spaces and the ecosystem services they provide. To foster collaboration between researchers and stakeholders, international platforms, such as the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and the City Biodiversity Index (Singapore Index), could be used. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据