4.7 Article

Willingness to pay for aesthetics associated with field windbreaks in Iowa, United States

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
卷 108, 期 2-4, 页码 71-78

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.005

关键词

Aesthetics; Agricultural lands; Contingent valuation; Ecosystem services; Field windbreaks; Willingness to pay

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Research Initiative (NRI) [2001-35108-10205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to determine a monetary value of aesthetics associated with field windbreaks in Iowa, United States. A mail survey and contingent valuation method (CVM) were used to determine willingness to pay (WTP) to support planting of field windbreaks for aesthetic purposes. A probit regression was conducted to examine how reported WTP estimates were affected by respondents' opinions on impact of field windbreaks on visual appearance of agricultural lands, perceived abundance of field windbreaks, familiarity with their benefits as well as education and occupation. A mean WTP ranged from US$4.77 to US$8.50. Respondents who were also farm operators were less likely to make the payment than non-farmers, possibly due to perceived opportunity cost associated with placing field windbreaks on agricultural lands. Respondents who found field windbreaks to make agricultural lands visually more appealing were willing to pay from US$1.94 to US$3.05 more than respondents who did not think so. Those who thought that from a visual perspective there were not enough windbreaks present in Iowa's landscape were willing to pay from US$1.67 to US$2.37 more than those who thought that the number of windbreaks was appropriate. The obtained WTP estimates will be useful in determining monetary trade-offs of future land use decisions and policies related to field windbreaks as well as other land use practices. The study results also will be helpful in developing new outreach and incentive programs for agricultural landowners. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据