4.4 Article

High nitrogen deposition may enhance growth of a new hybrid larch F-1 growing at two phosphorus levels

期刊

LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 1-8

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-012-0207-2

关键词

Larix gmelinii x L. kaempferi; Nitrogen deposition; Phosphorus limitation; Photosynthesis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24710027] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recently developed hybrid larch F-1 (F-1: Larix gmelinii var. japonica x L. kaempferi) is being planted widely in re- and afforestation projects in northeast Asia. Nitrogen (N) deposition to forest ecosystems has been rapidly increasing in this region, due mainly to industrialization and overuse of N fertilizer. Together with excess N, phosphorus (P) is considered to be the key determinant of tree growth in northeast Asia, because most soils have originated from immature volcanic ash. To predict the response of the F-1 to increasing N deposition and its relation with soil P availability related to immature volcanic ash soil in northern Japan, planting stocks of F-1 were grown in potted brown forest soil and categorised into eight treatments, comprising four N treatments covering the amount of N deposition observed and predicted in northeast Asia in combination with two P levels. N application increased the biomass and the light-saturated net photosynthetic rate (A (sat)) of the F-1 at all concentrations. Despite expectations, P did not have any effect on these parameters. As N application increased the content of potassium (K), magnesium (Mg) and chlorophyll (Chl) in needles, a positive correlation was found between the content of N, K, P and A (sat). These results suggest that N deposition improves the growth of the hybrid larch F-1 at least by improving the needle N condition, as well as the concentration of other macronutrients in the initial stage of plantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据