4.6 Article

SEASONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE OF SLOPING FARMLAND: A REVIEW OF ITS HYDROGEOMORPHIC IMPACTS

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 35-44

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2286

关键词

drainage ditch; cut-off drain; runoff; ephemeral gully; soil saturation; rill; stone bund

资金

  1. Belgian development cooperation through VLIR-UOS
  2. VLIR-UOS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of runoff-generating areas (saturated soils) and overland flow concentration in features such as drainage ditches makes sloping farmland vulnerable to soil erosion. The establishment of drainage ditches aims at draining the excess of water from the farmland, particularly in areas where soils are saturated in the rainy season. The hydrogeomorphic impacts on the farmland itself and on downstream areas need however also to be studied. Off site, downstream problems comprise higher peak discharges, leading to gully initiation, an increase in sediment load, and flooding problems. On-site problems such as the development of the drainage ditches into (ephemeral) gullies are less documented, although they may be important, as illustrated in the Lake Tana Basin (Ethiopia). The similarities and interactions between ephemeral gully channels and drainage ditches have to be considered to better understand all effects of drainage. Drainage ditches are a potential source of conflict between farmers with different interests and power, as well as between upstream and downstream users. A case study on drainage ditches on sloping farmlands in the Lake Tana Basin showed that nine out of ten catchments had drainage densities by ditches ranging from 53 to 510mha(-1). Drainage ditches were constructed with an average top width of 27 (+/- 9) cm. A significant correlation was found between stone bund density (physical conservation structures) and ditch drainage density (R=-072), in line with the Ethiopian government's ban on drainage ditches in farmlands where stone bunds have been constructed. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据