4.6 Article

High-resolution satellite imagery for detection of tracks and vegetation damage caused by all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) in Northern Norway

期刊

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 43-52

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.1047

关键词

fens; light ATVs; military battlefields; satellite remote sensing; sub-Arctic; Norway; tanks; vulnerable environment

资金

  1. Norwegian Defence Estates Agency
  2. Strategic Institute
  3. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA)
  4. Northern Research Institute (NORUT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Use of all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) in vulnerable environments may cause vegetation and soil erosion that will last for a long time. In northern parts of Norway, the growing use of ATVs off-road has made considerable damage to the environment. In Troms County, the Norwegian Army has exercise and shooting ranges (battlefields) where there has been extensive use of light, medium and heavy armored military vehicles and ATVs for decades. The main objective of this study has been to test the feasibility of high spatial resolution satellite imagery as Ikonos and Quickbird in combination with fieldwork to detect tracks and damage caused by heavy armoured military vehicles (tanks) as well as medium and light ATVs. Applying simple image processing techniques, this study showed that larger parts of these areas were influenced and even small tracks and minor damage on the vegetation caused by small ATVs were easily detected. The total length of the tracks within the battlefields was calculated to be c. 1000?km. Using a zone of damage/influence of 50?m on each side of the tracks, the damaged and/or influenced area by ATVs was estimated to cover 56?km2 (17 per cent) of the total area of 334?km2. The conclusion of this study is that high-resolution optical satellite images are well suited for surveying damage on the vegetation caused by terrain vehicles in northern Norway. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据