4.7 Review

Outcome markers for clinical trials in cerebral amyloid angiopathy

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 419-428

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70003-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AG26484, R01 NS070834, R01 NS067905]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw Vidi grant) [91711384]
  4. Netherlands Heart Foundation [2010T073]
  5. Erasmus MC Clinical Fellowship
  6. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres
  7. Alberta Innovates [201300690] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G1002605] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Stroke Association [TSABHF2009/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G1002605] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efforts are underway for early-phase trials of candidate treatments for cerebral amyloid angiopathy, an untreatable cause of haemorrhagic stroke and vascular cognitive impairment. A major barrier to these trials is the absence of consensus on measurement of treatment effectiveness. A range of potential outcome markers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy can be measured against the ideal criteria of being clinically meaningful, closely representative of biological progression, efficient for small or short trials, reliably measurable, and cost effective. In practice, outcomes tend either to have high clinical salience but low statistical efficiency, and thus more applicability for late-phase studies, or greater statistical efficiency but more limited clinical meaning. The most statistically efficient markers might be those that are potentially reversible with treatment, although their clinical significance remains unproven. Many of the candidate outcomes for cerebral amyloid angiopathy trials are probably applicable also to other small-vessel brain diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据