4.7 Review

Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 614-629

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70090-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Roche and Pfizer
  2. Boehringer lngelheim
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Elan Corporation
  5. Wyeth
  6. Novartis
  7. Pfizer
  8. Schwabe
  9. Sanofi-Aventis
  10. Eisai
  11. Roche Pharmaceuticals and Diagnostics
  12. GE Healthcare
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Avid
  15. Eli Lilly and Company
  16. Janssen-Cilag
  17. Merz Pharmaceuticals
  18. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals
  19. Jung Diagnostics
  20. Thermo Fisher Scientific Clinical Diagnostics BRAHM S GmbH
  21. Novartis and Nutricia
  22. Janssen
  23. Lundbedc
  24. Sanofi
  25. research and clinical trials from Eli Lilly
  26. GE Healthcare and Bayer Health.
  27. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
  28. Bayer/Piramal
  29. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals,
  30. Janssen Alzheimer's Immunotherapy
  31. Baxter
  32. Genetech
  33. Roche
  34. Merck
  35. Biogen
  36. Genentech
  37. Johnson Johnson
  38. Eli Lilly
  39. GE Healthcare for an investigator-initiated study
  40. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-SRF2013-8] Funding Source: researchfish
  41. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L001810/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  42. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10134, NF-SI-0508-10123] Funding Source: researchfish
  43. ESRC [ES/L001810/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past 8 years, both the International Working Group (IWG) and the US National Institute on Aging Alzheimer's Association have contributed criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that better define clinical phenotypes and integrate biomarkers into the diagnostic process, covering the full staging of the disease. This Position Paper considers the strengths and limitations of the IWG research diagnostic criteria and proposes advances to improve the diagnostic framework. On the basis of these refinements, the diagnosis of AD can be simplified, requiring the presence of an appropriate clinical AD phenotype (typical or atypical) and a pathophysiological biomarker consistent with the presence of Alzheimer's pathology. We propose that downstream topographical biomarkers of the disease, such as volumetric MRI and fiuorodeoxyglucose PET, might better serve in the measurement and monitoring of the course of disease. This paper also elaborates on the specific diagnostic criteria for atypical forms of AD, for mixed AD, and for the predinical states of AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据