4.7 Article

Effect of dronabinol on progression in progressive multiple sclerosis (CUPID): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 857-865

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70159-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme
  3. Multiple Sderosis Society
  4. Multiple Sclerosis Trust
  5. MRC [G0500290] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0500290] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10058] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Laboratory evidence has shown that cannabinoids might have a neuroprotective action. We investigated whether oral dronabinol (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) might slow the course of progressive multiple sclerosis. Methods In this multicentre, parallel, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we recruited patients aged 18-65 years with primary or secondary progressive multiple sderosis from 27 UK neurology or rehabilitation departments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dronabinol or placebo for 36 months; randomisation was by stochastic minimisation, using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, balanced according to expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, centre, and disease type. Maximum dose was 28 mg per day, titrated against bodyweight and adverse effects. Primary outcomes were EDSS score progression (masked assessor, time to progression of >= 1 point from a baseline score of 4.0-5.0 or >= 0.5 points from a baseline score of >= 5.5, confirmed after 6 months) and change from baseline in the physical impact subscale of the 29-item multiple sderosis impact scale (MSIS-29-PHYS). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 62942668). Findings Of the 498 patients randomly assigned to a treatment group, 329 received at least one dose of dronabinol and 164 received at least one dose of placebo (five did not receive the allocated intervention). 145 patients in the dronabinol group had EDSS score progression (0-24 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate) compared with 73 in the placebo group (0-23 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate); HR for prespecified primary analysis was 0-92 (95% CI 0.68-1-23; p=0-57). Mean yearly change in MSIS-29-PHYS score was 0-62 points (SD 3-29) in the dronabinol group versus 1.03 points (3.74) in the placebo group. Primary analysis with a multilevel model gave an estimated between-group difference (dronabinol placebo) of 0.9 points (95% CI -2.0 to 0.2). We noted no serious safety concerns (114 [35%] patients in the dronabinol group had at least one serious adverse event, compared with 46 [28%] in the placebo group). Interpretation Our results show that dronabinol has no overall effect on the progression of multiple sderosis in the progressive phase. The findings have implications for the design of future studies of progressive multiple sderosis, because lower than expected progression rates might have affected our ability to detect clinical change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据