4.7 Article

Florbetapir PET analysis of amyloid-β deposition in the presenilin 1 E280A autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease kindred: a cross-sectional study

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 1057-1065

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70227-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
  2. Abbott Laboratories
  3. AC Immune
  4. Adamas
  5. Allergan
  6. Avanir
  7. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  8. Chase Pharmaceuticals
  9. Chiesi
  10. Eisai
  11. Elan
  12. Medavante
  13. Merz
  14. Neuroptix
  15. Novartis
  16. Otsuka
  17. Sanofi-Aventis
  18. Schering-Plough
  19. Worldwide Clinical Trials
  20. AstraZeneca
  21. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  22. Genentech
  23. GlaxoSmithKline
  24. Janssen
  25. Eli Lilly
  26. Medivation
  27. Merck and Company
  28. Pfizer
  29. Roche
  30. Toyama
  31. Wyeth Laboratories
  32. Baxter Healthcare
  33. Functional Neuromodulation
  34. GE Healthcare
  35. Targacept
  36. NIA
  37. National Institute of Mental Health
  38. Alzheimer's Association
  39. Arizona Department of Health Services
  40. Banner Alzheimer's Foundation
  41. Nomis Foundation
  42. Anonymous Foundation
  43. Forget Me Not Initiative
  44. Colciencias [1115-408-20512, 1115-408-20543P30]
  45. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG031581, P30 AG19610]
  46. State of Arizona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Fibrillar amyloid-beta (A beta) is thought to begin accumulating in the brain many years before the onset of clinical impairment in patients with Alzheimer's disease. By assessing the accumulation of A beta in people at risk of genetic forms of Alzheimer's disease, we can identify how early preclinical changes start in individuals certain to develop dementia later in life. We sought to characterise the age-related accumulation of A beta deposition in presenilin 1 (PSEN1) E280A mutation carriers across the spectrum of preclinical disease. Methods Between Aug 1 and Dec 6, 2011, members of the familial Alzheimer's disease Colombian kindred aged 18-60 years were recruited from the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative's registry at the University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia. Cross-sectional assessment using florbetapir PET was done in symptomatic mutation carriers with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, asymptomatic carriers, and asymptomatic non-carriers. These assessments were done at the Banner Alzheimer's Institute in Phoenix, AZ, USA. A cortical grey matter mask consisting of six predefined regions.was used to measure mean cortical florbetapir PET binding. Cortical-to-pontine standard-uptake value ratios were used to characterise the cross-sectional accumulation of fibrillar A beta deposition in carriers and non-carriers with regression analysis and to estimate the trajectories of fibrillar A beta deposition. Findings We enrolled a cohort of 11 symptomatic individuals, 19 presymptomatic mutation carriers, and 20 asymptomatic non-carriers, ranging in age from 20 to 56 years. There was greater florbetapir binding in asymptomatic PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers than in age matched non-carriers. Fibrillar A beta began to accumulate in PSEN 1E280A mutation carriers at a mean age of 28.2 years (95% CI 27-3-33.4), about 16 years and 21 years before the predicted median ages at mild cognitive impairment and dementia onset, respectively. F-18 florbetapir binding rose steeply over the next 9.4 years and plateaued at a mean age of 37.6 years (95% CI 35.3-40.2), about 6 and 11 years before the expected respective median ages at mild cognitive impairment and dementia onset. Prominent florbetapir binding was seen in the anterior and posterior cingulate, precuneus, and parietotemporal and frontal grey matter, as well as in the basal ganglia. Binding in the basal ganglia was not seen earlier or more prominently than in other regions. Interpretation These findings contribute to the understanding of preclinical familial Alzheimer's disease and help set the stage for assessment of amyloid-modifying treatments in the prevention of familial Alzheimer's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据