4.7 Review

Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 649-656

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70121-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. FISM
  2. Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata)
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Scientific Research (MIUR)
  4. Progetto Limonte
  5. Fondazione Carige
  6. Roche
  7. Allergan
  8. Biogen Idec
  9. Genentech
  10. Merck Serono
  11. Sanofi-Aventis
  12. Biogen-Dompe
  13. Novartis
  14. Bayer-Schering
  15. Bayer
  16. Teva
  17. Celgene
  18. Lansdowne DIME
  19. Medscape
  20. Genzyme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rationale for use of adult stem cells as a treatment for neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis arose from the hope that they had the capacity to foster repair of the CNS through tissue integration and differentiation into neural cells. Evidence from preclinical studies suggested that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), a subset of adult progenitor cells, are an effective therapy in preclinical animal models of neurological diseases such as experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a model for multiple sclerosis, and stroke. In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, intravenous injection of MSCs ameliorates clinical course and decreases demyelination, immune infiltrates, and axonal loss. Surprisingly, these effects do not require full CNS engraftment by MSCs, but rely on the capacity of MSCs to inhibit pathogenic immune responses and release neuroprotective and pro-oligodendrogenic molecules favouring tissue repair. These results led to the conclusion that therapeutic use of MSCs should initially focus on individuals with multiple sclerosis and persistent inflammation. Small clinical studies in different neurological diseases have suggested that MSCs are safe, paving the road for larger phase 2 studies addressing the effect of MSCs on clinical outcomes and markers of disease activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据