4.7 Article

Sustained disease-activity-free status in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets in the CLARITY study: a post-hoc and subgroup analysis

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 329-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70023-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Merck Serono SA-Geneva, Switzerland
  2. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany
  3. Bayer-Schering
  4. Biogen Idec
  5. Five Prime Therapeutics
  6. Merck
  7. Serono
  8. Novartis
  9. Teva-Aventis
  10. UCB Pharma
  11. Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  12. Merck Serono
  13. GW Pharmaceuticals
  14. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  15. Merz
  16. Bayer
  17. Sanofi-Aventis
  18. Actinobac Scientific
  19. EMD Serono/Pfizer
  20. Teva
  21. Genentech
  22. Biogen
  23. Genzyme
  24. Acorda
  25. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  26. Ilich Foundation
  27. GenMab/GlaxoSmithKline
  28. Elan
  29. Teva/Sanofi-Aventis
  30. Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background On the basis of various clinical and MRI measurements, the phase 3 Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) study in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) showed that short-course oral treatment with cladribine at cumulative doses of 3.5 and 5.25 mg/kg over 96 weeks was more effective than placebo. Achieving sustained freedom from disease activity is becoming a viable treatment goal in RRMS; we therefore aimed to assess the effects of cladribine on this composite outcome measure by doing a post-hoc analysis of data from the CLARITY study. Methods Freedom from disease activity is composed of three components that are commonly used individually as endpoints in clinical trials; it is defined as the patient having no relapse, no 3-month sustained change in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, and no new MRI lesions (no T1 gadolinium-enhancing or active T2 lesions) over a specified period. We assessed the effect of two doses of cladtibine tablets versus placebo on the proportion of patients who were free from disease activity based on the individual components, all pair-wise combinations, and the composite of the three components (freedom from disease activity). Freedom from disease activity was analysed at 24, 48, and 96 weeks, and in subgroups of patients stratified according to baseline demographic and disease characteristics (age, disease duration, previous treatment with disease-modifying therapy, T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion number, T2 lesion volume, EDSS score, number of previous relapses, and highly active disease). Findings Of the 1326 patients randomly assigned to treatment in the CLARITY study, 1192 were assessable for freedom from disease activity at 96 weeks. Over 24 weeks, 266 (67%) of 395 patients in the cladribine 3.5 mg/kg group and 283 (70%) of 406 in the cladribine 5.25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 145 (39%) of 373 in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 3.31, 95% CI 2.46-4.46 for the 3.5 mg/kg group; and 3.68, 2.73-4.97 for the 5.25 mg/kg group; both p < 0.0001). Over 48 weeks, 208 (54%) of 384 patients in the cladribine 3.5 mg/kg group and 222 (56%) of 396 patients in the cladribine 5.25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 86 (24%) of 360 patients in the placebo group (OR 3.80, 2.77-5.22 for the 3.5 mg/kg group; 4.13, 3.02-5.66 for the 5.25 mg/kg group; both p<0.0001). Over 96 weeks, 178 (44%) of 402 patients in the cladribine 3.5 mg/kg group and 189 (46%) of 411 patients in the cladribine 5.25 mg/kg group were free from disease activity, versus 60 (16%) of 379 patients in the placebo group (OR 4.28, 3.05-6.02 for the 3.5 mg/kg group; 4.62, 3.29-6.48 for the 5.25 mg/kg group; both p<0.0001). The effects of cladribine tablets on freedom from disease activity were significant across all patient subgroups. Interpretation Treatment with cladribine tablets significantly increased the proportion of patients with sustained freedom from disease activity over 96 weeks compared with placebo. Sustained freedom from disease activity could become an important measure of therapeutic response in RRMS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据