4.8 Article

Perinatal mental health 2 Bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia in pregnancy and the post-partum period

期刊

LANCET
卷 384, 期 9956, 页码 1789-1799

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61278-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chief Investigator of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme [RP-RP-DG-1108-10012]
  2. NIHR
  3. Tommy's baby
  4. NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at the South London
  5. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. British Occupational Health Research Foundation
  8. National Institute of Social Care Research and Health Research
  9. Big Lottery
  10. Medical Research Council (MRC)
  11. Women's Mental Health Trust
  12. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  13. Medical Research Foundation for research in post-partum psychosis
  14. Indian Council of Medical Research
  15. Ranbaxy India
  16. Medical Research Council [MR/L010305/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  17. Medical Research Foundation [C0439] Funding Source: researchfish
  18. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [RP-DG-1108-10012] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The perinatal period is associated with an increased risk of severe mental disorders. We summarise the evidence regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of severe mental illness in relation to childbirth, focusing on bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia. We discuss women with ongoing chronic conditions and those with the onset of new episodes of post-partum psychosis. Despite the importance of perinatal episodes, with suicide a leading cause of maternal death, few studies are available to guide the management of women with severe mental disorders in pregnancy and the post-partum period. However, general principles of management are discussed, including the need for an individual risk-benefit analysis for each woman.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据