4.8 Article

Once-weekly dulaglutide versus once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-6): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

期刊

LANCET
卷 384, 期 9951, 页码 1349-1357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60976-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eli Lilly and Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Dulaglutide and liraglutide, both glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, improve glycaemic control and reduce weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a head-to-head trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide with that of once-daily liraglutide in metformin-treated patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Methods We did a phase 3, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study at 62 sites in nine countries between June 20, 2012, and Nov 25, 2013. Patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes receiving metformin (>= 1500 mg/day), aged 18 years or older, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 7.0% or greater (>= 53 mmol/mol) and 10.0% or lower (<= 86 mmol/mol), and body-mass index 45 kg/m(2) or lower were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (1.5 mg) or once-daily liraglutide (1.mg). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice response system. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was non-inferiority (margin 0.4%) of dulaglutide compared with liraglutide for change in HbA(1c) (least-squares mean change from baseline) at 26 weeks. Safety data were collected for a further 4 weeks' follow-up. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01624259. Findings We randomly assigned 599 patients to receive once-weekly dulaglutide (299 patients) or once-daily liraglutide (300 patients). 269 participants in each group completed treatment at week 26. Least-squares mean reduction in HbA(1c) was -1.42% (SE 0.05) in the dulaglutide group and -1.36% (0.05) in the liraglutide group. Mean treatment difference in HbA(1c) was -0.06% (95% CI -0.19 to 0.07, Pnon-inferiority<0.0001) between the two groups. The most common gastrointestinal adverse events were nausea (61 [20%] in dulaglutide group vs 54 [18%] in liraglutide group), diarrhoea (36 [12%] vs 36 [12%]), dyspepsia (24 [8%] vs 18 [6%]), and vomiting (21 [7%] vs 25 [8%]), with similar rates of study or study drug discontinuation because of adverse events between the two groups (18 [6%] in each group). The hypoglycaemia rate was 0.34 (SE 1.44) and 0.52 (3.01) events per patient per year, respectively, and no severe hypoglycaemia was reported. Interpretation Once-weekly dulaglutide is non-inferior to once-daily liraglutide for least-squares mean reduction in HbA(1c), with a similar safety and tolerability profile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据